Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These NATO Expansion results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 817 hits. Analysis detected 6,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 13,026 topics). This NATO Expansion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
NATO Expansion
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%NATO Expansion (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 7,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
NATO Expansion attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
NATO Expansion vs sitewide
NATO Expansion attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos