Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Research results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,983 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,048 of 14,048 topics). This Nasa Research is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Nasa Research
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠57%Nasa Research (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,983
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nasa Research attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nasa Research vs sitewide
Nasa Research attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos