Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Modern Society results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Nature, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 1,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 22,045 topics). This Modern Society is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Modern Society
Topic details
Total words: 2,532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.5%13.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos