Topic summary

⁠47%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Miranda Rights results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 3,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (8,010 of 12,390 topics). This Miranda Rights is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.

Miranda Rights

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠36%	Miranda Rights (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,640

Article count: 1

Authors

Cayla Mihalovich

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Miranda Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Miranda Rights vs sitewide

Miranda Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Do these jailhouse stings go too far? CA Supreme Court to decide⁠^44%

CalMatters⁠^32%By Cayla Mihalovich⁠^26%7/14/2026, 1:00:00 PM