Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video3,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Supplies results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 1.5% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 629 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,378 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (24,473 of 24,545 topics). This Military Supplies is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Military Supplies
Topic details
Total words: 9,378
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos