Topic summary
52%1 analyzed article/video659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Conditions results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 2,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 71% (7,216 of 24,545 topics). This Military Conditions is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Military Conditions
Topic details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos