Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mfa results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Circular Reasoning, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 1.8% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 299 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,490 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Mfa is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mfa
Topic details
Total words: 2,490
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos