Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video3,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexican Politics results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,635 hits. Analysis detected 11,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (14,605 of 24,545 topics). This Mexican Politics is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Mexican Politics
Topic details
Total words: 14,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos