Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mental Health In Music results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,000 of 24,545 topics). This Mental Health In Music is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Mental Health In Music
Topic details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos