Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mega Millions Drawings results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 231 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (19,520 of 22,131 topics). This Mega Millions Drawings is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Mega Millions Drawings
Topic details
Total words: 1,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos