Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Medical Professionals In Politics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Professionals In Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Medical Professionals In Politics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Medical Professionals In Politics (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 2,580

Article count: 1

Authors

Elizabeth Maline

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Medical Professionals In Politics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Medical Professionals In Politics vs sitewide

Medical Professionals In Politics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

MAHA has inspired a wave of medical professionals to run for office⁠^25%

MS NOW⁠^95%By Elizabeth Maline⁠^0%6/9/2026, 7:57:08 AM