Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video1,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manipulation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 955 hits. Analysis detected 5,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (10,709 of 21,665 topics). This Manipulation is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Manipulation
Topic details
Total words: 6,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos