Topic summary
22%1 analyzed article/video363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Padres National Forest results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 684 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,089 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,159 of 16,562 topics). This Los Padres National Forest is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Los Padres National Forest
Topic details
Total words: 1,089
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Los Padres National Forest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Los Padres National Forest vs sitewide
Los Padres National Forest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos