Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lobbying Regulations results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 722 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,155 of 24,545 topics). This Lobbying Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Lobbying Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 19.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos