Topic summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Challenges To Affirmative Action results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,037 of 24,545 topics). This Legal Challenges To Affirmative Action is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Legal Challenges To Affirmative Action
Topic details
Total words: 1,640
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Straw Man: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos