Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Leadership In Scientific Organizations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 4,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 12,760 topics). This Leadership In Scientific Organizations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Leadership In Scientific Organizations

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Pizza Oven	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Leadership In Scientific Organizations (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 2,420

Article count: 1

Authors

Bill Ponton

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Leadership In Scientific Organizations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Leadership In Scientific Organizations vs sitewide

Leadership In Scientific Organizations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Addressing institutional rot⁠^75%

American Thinker⁠^94%By Bill Ponton⁠^0%7/16/2026, 4:00:00 AM