Topic summary
7%1 analyzed article/video1,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Junk Science results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,387 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (11,668 of 14,048 topics). This Junk Science is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Junk Science
Topic details
Total words: 3,387
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Junk Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Junk Science vs sitewide
Junk Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos