Topic summary
24%1 analyzed article/video989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Security results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 2,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 27% (9,054 of 12,295 topics). This Judicial Security is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Judicial Security
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Security attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Security vs sitewide
Judicial Security attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.