Topic summary
62%6 analyzed articles/videos4,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Review results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 8,136 hits. Analysis detected 42,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,354 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (8,809 of 14,252 topics). This Judicial Review is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Judicial Review
Topic details
Total words: 34,354
Article count: 6
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Review attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Review vs sitewide
Judicial Review attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.