Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Judicial Nominations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 3,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Nominations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Judicial Nominations (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Nominations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Nominations vs sitewide
Judicial Nominations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos