Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Harassment results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 8,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (9,757 of 16,110 topics). This Judicial Harassment is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Judicial Harassment
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 40%Judicial Harassment (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 9,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Harassment attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Harassment vs sitewide
Judicial Harassment attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos