Topic summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos2,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Ethics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 4,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,878 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (9,955 of 12,295 topics). This Judicial Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Ethics
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Ethics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Ethics vs sitewide
Judicial Ethics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.