Topic summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos2,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Conflicts Of Interest results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,171 hits. Analysis detected 5,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,016 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (17,595 of 21,483 topics). This Judicial Conflicts Of Interest is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Judicial Conflicts Of Interest
Topic details
Total words: 10,016
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Conflicts Of Interest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Conflicts Of Interest vs sitewide
Judicial Conflicts Of Interest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos