Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Appointments results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 495 hits. Analysis detected 6,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,274 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (11,143 of 13,018 topics). This Judicial Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Judicial Appointments
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Judicial Appointments attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Judicial Appointments vs sitewide
Judicial Appointments attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.