Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Judicial Accountability results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 3,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Judicial Accountability is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Judicial Accountability

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Judicial Accountability (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 4,684

Article count: 1

Authors

Carrie Johnson

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Judicial Accountability attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Judicial Accountability vs sitewide

Judicial Accountability attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Three judges, three scandals and new scrutiny of judicial accountability⁠^25%

NPR⁠^84%By Carrie Johnson⁠^0%6/9/2026, 3:42:39 PM