Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivf results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 841 hits. Analysis detected 5,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,961 of 24,545 topics). This Ivf is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Ivf
Topic details
Total words: 4,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.7%18.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos