Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Israel Hamas Conflict results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,836 topics). This Israel Hamas Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Israel Hamas Conflict
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Israel Hamas Conflict (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Israel Hamas Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Israel Hamas Conflict vs sitewide
Israel Hamas Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos