Topic summary
46%1 analyzed article/video1,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iraq War Debate results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 3,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 38% (12,993 of 20,874 topics). This Iraq War Debate is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Iraq War Debate
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iraq War Debate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iraq War Debate vs sitewide
Iraq War Debate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.