Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos8,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Peace Talks results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 4,068 hits. Analysis detected 29,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,288 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (11,723 of 13,018 topics). This Iran Peace Talks is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Iran Peace Talks
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Peace Talks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Peace Talks vs sitewide
Iran Peace Talks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.