Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Oman Strait Of Hormuz Agreement results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 1,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (20,576 of 24,545 topics). This Iran Oman Strait Of Hormuz Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Iran Oman Strait Of Hormuz Agreement
Topic details
Total words: 7,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos