Topic summary
73%10 analyzed articles/videos7,908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Program results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,667 hits. Analysis detected 28,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,213 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (11,492 of 12,996 topics). This Iran Nuclear Program is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Program
Topic details
Total words: 35,213
Article count: 10
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Nuclear Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Nuclear Program vs sitewide
Iran Nuclear Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.