Topic summary
0%25 analyzed articles/videos5,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Deal results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 5,252 hits. Analysis detected 44,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,088 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (8,262 of 13,019 topics). This Iran Nuclear Deal is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Deal
Topic details
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Nuclear Deal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Nuclear Deal vs sitewide
Iran Nuclear Deal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.