Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,005 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Investment Risk results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 876 hits. Analysis detected 7,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,387 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Risk is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.

Investment Risk

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠44%	Investment Risk (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 8,020

Article count: 1

Authors

Paul Kiel

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Investment Risk attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Investment Risk vs sitewide

Investment Risk attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Wall Street Wants to Change the Rules for Your 401(k). It Could Put Your Retirement at Risk.⁠^47%

ProPublica⁠^30%By Paul Kiel⁠^0%7/8/2026, 3:00:00 AM