Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Intraparty Conflict results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 2,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Intraparty Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Intraparty Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 1,644
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Intraparty Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Intraparty Conflict vs sitewide
Intraparty Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos