Topic summary
6%1 analyzed article/video1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Sports Law results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 1,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 11% (10,435 of 11,719 topics). This International Sports Law is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
International Sports Law
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Sports Law attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Sports Law vs All Other Publications
International Sports Law attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.