BS Summary: These International Solidarity Movements results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,349 hits. Analysis detected 3,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,430 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 10,867 topics). This International Solidarity Movements is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
International Solidarity Movements
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Solidarity Movements attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Solidarity Movements vs All Other Publications
International Solidarity Movements attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.