Topic summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video1,047 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Relocation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 1,003 hits. Analysis detected 2,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,392 of 23,916 topics). This International Relocation is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
International Relocation
Topic details
Total words: 4,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 23.9%23.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos