Topic summary

⁠21%1 analyzed article/video874 analyzed words

BS Summary: These International Relations (us-China) results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (15,862 of 21,286 topics). This International Relations (us-China) is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.

International Relations (us-China)

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Back-To-School	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠26%	International Relations (us-China) (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,496

Article count: 1

Authors

Brad Plumer

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

International Relations (us-China) attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

International Relations (us-China) vs sitewide

International Relations (us-China) attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Trump administration is repurposing federal land for AI data centers⁠^15%

Las Vegas Sun⁠^65%By Brad Plumer⁠^22%7/30/2026, 7:00:00 PM