Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,285 analyzed words

BS Summary: These International Justice results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 604 hits. Analysis detected 3,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (14,064 of 16,562 topics). This International Justice is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.

International Justice

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠16%	International Justice (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,140

Article count: 1

Authors

Deborah Amos

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

International Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

International Justice vs sitewide

International Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Syria Faces Dilemma in Prosecuting Assad-Era War Criminals⁠^24%

Foreign Policy⁠^32%By Deborah Amos⁠^0%6/19/2026, 5:00:15 AM