Topic summary
96%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Emergency Economic Powers Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,733 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (5,487 of 13,598 topics). This International Emergency Economic Powers Act is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Topic details
Total words: 2,733
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
International Emergency Economic Powers Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
International Emergency Economic Powers Act vs sitewide
International Emergency Economic Powers Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos