Topic summary
1%1 analyzed article/video212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intergovernmental Agreements results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (13,958 of 14,686 topics). This Intergovernmental Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Intergovernmental Agreements
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Intergovernmental Agreements attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Intergovernmental Agreements vs sitewide
Intergovernmental Agreements attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.