Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Intergenerational Connections results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,594 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Intergenerational Connections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Intergenerational Connections
Topic details
Total words: 3,594
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos