Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Instastories results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 83 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,817 of 24,545 topics). This Instastories is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Instastories
Topic details
Total words: 400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles400 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos