Topic summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Information Warfare results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Pessimism Bias , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 2,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (23,488 of 24,545 topics). This Information Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Information Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 9,416
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst