Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Independent Expenditures results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,729 topics). This Independent Expenditures is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Independent Expenditures
Topic details
Total words: 1,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos