Topic summary
ā 30%1 analyzed article/video841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inclusivity results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (16,845 of 22,214 topics). This Inclusivity is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Inclusivity
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos