Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These In Court results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 44% (7,336 of 13,018 topics). This In Court is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
In Court
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
In Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
In Court vs sitewide
In Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.