Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Court results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 928 hits. Analysis detected 8,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,724 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (12,929 of 13,257 topics). This Immigration Court is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Immigration Court
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Immigration Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Immigration Court vs sitewide
Immigration Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.