Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 1,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,011 of 24,545 topics). This Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act
Topic details
Total words: 3,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos