Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video2,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Abuses results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 5,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (15,919 of 22,261 topics). This Ice Abuses is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Ice Abuses
Topic details
Total words: 8,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos